RSP Rorschach: QB Dylan Thompson


Photo by Pablo Fernandez

Photo by Pablo Fernandez

Some plays are like Rorschach drawings: There is no singular answer, but they will elicit a strong leaning in one direction.

It has been a quarterback-heavy month at RSP HQ, which means a great deal of ambiguity. Sound decision-making is a vital asset of successful quarterback play. However, as in life, successful decisions are often the ones that aren’t formulaic or fit neatly as an algorithm on a 3×5 index card tucked inside my little brother’s pocket protector (Harvard PhD, need I say more?).

With the exception of using algorithms to make emotion based decisions, he’s not that nerdy (on the outside).

Whether it is algorithms, tarot cards, coin flips, or prayer, few have perfect information to base a decision. Studying quarterback tape illustrates this fact. I studied South Carolina passer Dylan Thompson the other day and came away impressed with some of the tools that the 6-3, 218-pound signal caller might offer an NFL team as a late-round pick, or more likely, a free agent granted a camp tryout.

As you’ll learn in my upcoming Futures column on CSU-Pueblo QB Chris Bonner, I value a healthy mindset of aggression in my quarterback play. Thompson often displays this mindset when he spots single coverage.

An example is a target of a receiver up the right sideline with 12:42 in the first quarter of the Auburn game. One of Thompson’s strengths is the ability to set his feet fast from the snap, a play fake, or off a boot. He displays this quick set off a pivot here and delivers a ball to the back shoulder of the receiver with nice trajectory. The receiver makes a last-second adjustment, catching the ball above the trailing corner back after a leap and turn to the target.

But forget about the result for a moment and examine the process. If you had to attribute the majority of this play’s success to one factor, what would it be? Was it a good throw based on what you see on the field or was it a mediocre throw aided by the receiver’s catch? Or was it really the quality of the coverage?

All three are certainly factors, but if you’re evaluating Dylan Thompson for a team and you’re preparing a hit-list of plays to watch when he visits the facility, what are you most likely to assume before you ask him about the play?

So is it the throw, the catch, or the coverage. Here are some reasons for each take:

  • The Catch: The throw forces the receiver to turn towards the trailing coverage, which is rarely the best placement for a pass. The receiver’s early jump and turn creates separation to make an uncontested reception despite the presence of the defender.
  • The Throw: Thompson opts for a back-shoulder placement because he anticipates the safety working across the field to the sideline before he makes the throw and if he leads the receiver there’s a good chance that the safety breaks up this pass whereas a back-shoulder placement gives a receiver a 1-on-1 rather than a 1-on-2 matchup with the ball in the air.
  • The Coverage: The corner has safety help coming over the top but let the WR run by too easily, which enhances the quarterback’s placement decision.

There may not be a correct answer here. I have my take, but let’s hear from you.

 For analysis of skill players in this year’s draft class, download the 2014 Rookie Scouting Portfolio – available now. Better yet, if you’re a fantasy owner the 56-page Post-Draft Add-on comes with the 2012 – 2014 RSPs at no additional charge. Best, yet, 10 percent of every sale is donated to Darkness to Light to combat sexual abuse. You can purchase past editions of the Rookie Scouting Portfolio for just $9.95 apiece. 

Get the early bird discount by pre-ordering the 2015 RSP now through February 10!

Categories: 2015 NFL Draft, Analysis, Matt Waldman, Players, Quarterback, RSP RorschachTags: , , , , , , , ,

4 comments

  1. Cover 2. The CB should be funneling the WR inside towards his help. Instead he gives him a free release behind him and doesn’t have the athleticism to close on the ball, even though it’s thrown a little short. The QBs footwork was fine (two step drop and a hitch) for the route, but the ball needed to be out front a little more. This is a good example of good enough for college, but wont work in the NFL. He is taking advantage of poor DB play and not necessarily making a play.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: